1. Guest, as per the stickied thread, this forum has not been in use since 2014. All bugs and feature requests should be posted to JIRA.

Solved Essentials Chat Format REFUSES to Work.

Discussion in 'Bugs & Feature Requests' started by lecraeman, Aug 5, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. I have my essentials chat format setup how I wanted it. However, It DOES NOT work. I have removed several plugins I thought were breaking it, but none of them worked :( I am on essentials dev 2.12.4! Here is my plugin list:



    I know it is a lot, but I actually use them all. Here is my essentials chat config:

    Basically, I want it to display something like this:

    "[Faction] Name: MESSAGE"

    It instead displays like this:

    "<Faction Name> Message"

    I have been trying to fix this for ages. I just can't :( it has literally been broken forever. I don't know what is doing it, and I haven't been able to change it forever :( please help!

    P.S. I am using Spigot.
     
    #1 lecraeman, Aug 5, 2013
    Last edited: Aug 5, 2013
  2. Dmck2b

    Services Staff

    Did you even once think about looking in Faction's preset config for chat?

    "chatSetFormatTo": "<{factions_relcolor}§l{factions_roleprefix}§r{factions_relcolor}{factions_name|rp}§f%1$s> %2$s",

    Nothing to do with Spigot at all.
     
  3. I have looked for that FOREVER. I am using an old faction. The one before MCore. Where is that located, and how can I make essential bypass?
     
  4. Dmck2b

    Services Staff

    /plugins/factions/config.json I think.

    Don't have a build offhand that still uses only Factions, but I think if you edit this line

    "chatSetFormat": true,

    It should disable it. If not, try adding your Essentials chat into it and see if anything good comes of it?
     
  5. No, That is not in mine, as previously stated, I am using an older version because I can't use MCore. So, I have the version before that.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  6. Which version 1.6 or 1.8 factions? both have different tags
     
  7. Version 1.6.9.4
     
  8. Dmck2b

    Services Staff

    Factions 1.8.2:
    "chatSetFormat": false,
    "chatSetFormatTo": "<{faction_relcolor}§l{faction_roleprefix}§r{faction_relcolor}{faction_tag_pr}§f%s> %s",
    "chatParseTags": true,
    "chatParseTagsColored": false,

    Factions 1.6.9.4:
    "chatTagEnabled": true,
    "chatTagRelationColored": true,
    "chatTagReplaceString": "[FACTION]",
    "chatTagInsertAfterString": "",
    "chatTagInsertBeforeString": "",
    "chatTagInsertIndex": 1,
    "chatTagPadBefore": false,
    "chatTagPadAfter": true,
    "chatTagFormat": "%s§f",

    Both in conf.json
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  9. There you go [FACTION] is the tag not {faction_*}
     
  10. So, What am I editing here? I am not very plugin savvy(Even though I have been doing this for 5 months).
     
  11. Dmck2b

    Services Staff

    "chatTagEnabled": true,

    Change that to false and Essentials should override it.
     
  12. I did that...did not work. ^.^ Let me do it again!
     
  13. Factions wont parse the tag then and you will be left with [FACTION].
    Unless essentials handles it as well of course :S
     
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  14. Ok, I what Dmck2b said...it now shows no faction tag, but it is still the "<name>Message" format. Even thought that's not the format I have it set to.

    Do I HAVE to have group formats?
     
  15. Also this is the format for essentials that you want [FACTION]&r{DISPLAYNAME}: &r {MESSAGE}
     
  16. I gave it that format, and essentials says it's working, but it isn't :( I don't understand.

    It's like it just goes to default.
     
  17. I did all you guys said, and it broke my config! Now I am left here trying to figure this out.
     
  18. Ok, I did this and it broke my config. Now what do I do!??!
     
  19. Fixed that, but now it just says:

    [FACTION]Lecraeman: Hey Everyone.

    It actually says faction...instead of replacing it.
     
    • Creative Creative x 1
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.