JoBa97 submitted a new resource: MongoDB Java Object Builder - Utility class to directly load and save Java Objects from/to a MongoDB Database Read more about this resource...
Simple answer: yes. Example of a structure I'm using. (Interesting part is probably the Area array) http://paste.md-5.net/bayajoweke.java Recursion (e.g. saving an instance of an object in one if it's field) would cause a stack overflow though.
why would it cause a stack overflow??? I've written similar java program (not for a plugin) but using XML to serialize/deserialize an Object. I had to do recursive process and had to map every single primitive types, and any object types in to XML. If I have an object which has Map<ItemStack, List<Player>> as an instance, how does your plugin same this into MongoDB?
you should use introspection so that the objects you can handle does not have to be a subclass of DBxxx.
Probably going to do that if it turns out that there are people who are using this. Regarding your first question. A Map<ItemStack, List<Player>> could only be saved if you defined a TypeConverter for it, but that's not really a problem. Although saving the player object doesn't really make sense, you should rather save it's uuid. This project's goal to be a really simple and easy to use library rather than something complex and - for some people - confusing like Morphia
JoBa97 updated MongoDB Java Object Builder with a new update entry: MongoDB 3.0 Read the rest of this update entry...
