Which one is better

wear is the hosting based on?
Because remember the ms/ping between server and players

 

He is asking which spec runs more efficient for a minecraft server. @Hysan for me the 2nd one, I don't know why.

 

I would personally go the second one.

 

yeah ik but remember the ping between players and the server too. That can change effect too. but @Hysan for me 2nd one. faster maby the ram but faster.

 

He didn't specify the latency nor location of the data centers, so we have to go off of what he provided us.

 

I would personally recommend Choice 1

 

Mind if I ask why you would pick choice 1 over the other choice? Just curious

 

i just said "remember the ping between players and the server too" to him.....

 

How does the latency pertain the the quote?

 

Really?
Am I to assume all your friends are dead?

 

Hey,

He has not specified what he will be using the machine for so I would pick choice 1 for the following reasons.

1. The Xeon E5 has 6 cores over 4 cores on the Xeon E3.
2. SSD vs HDD would variety again on what he is using the machine for.
3. Then We have 16GB over the 8GB.

Unless he gives a general idea on what he will be using it for, I cannot really give my exact answer.

 

@Mr.Midnight now we have an location then @Hysan remember the ping between server and player c:

 

@Hysan why not buy some parts to an own machine? and send it to a datacenter?

 

Wrong thread I think?

Now that is better. I would prefer using that than the other two. @Hysan what is the name of the hosting company?

He wants to rent a server, therefore he cannot change the offers of the hosting.

 

Hey,

Sorry I wasn't thinking before posting that ahaha. If you are using it for Minecraft servers then I would recommend choice number two then as Hosting MC servers will not use 6 cores. I change my answer to choice number two (Paying $95 is not bad at all)