who thinks staminas/interpad is a rip of

Discussion in 'Spigot Discussion' started by fan, Jul 27, 2013.

?

who thinks staminas/interpad is a rip of

  1. yes

    16.7%
  2. no

    83.3%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. fan

    fan

    who thinks staminas/interpad is a rip of?

    yes

    or

    no
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 6
  2. Very convincing if you can't even spell the names correct... No, they are not a rip-off.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  3. fan

    fan


    i dont need ur life story vote yes or no
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  4. My life story is only a few thousand lines longer than that, my bad. Would love to hear your life story, seems like that would enrich mine!
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  5. I'm hosted at Intreppid too.. Very good and reliable service
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  6. joehot200

    Supporter

    I've listened to much of this thread's voluble oratory, but I admit I'm a little confused. Sure, I'm just an average person and not some intellectual, all-knowing brainiac, but it seems to me that I insist that it needs to be taken into account that the ideological fervor of this thread's satellites springs from their desire to seek temporary tactical alliances with scornful cads in order to take over society's eyes, ears, mind, and spirit. Here's my side of the story: This thread is a hard worker. It works hard to prevent anyone from commenting on its churlish reportages. This is of course most illuminating, but what if we wish to engage rather in eristic search for truth, or in heuristic debate, or perhaps in paromologetic illation? In my experience, I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "This thread's epigrams are a parody of original thought." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that this thread uses highfalutin terms like "unexceptionableness" and "internationalization" to conceal its plans to foment, precipitate, and finance large-scale wars to emasculate and bankrupt nations and thereby force them into a one-world government. In this scheme of its, a mass of grandiloquent words falls upon the facts like soft snow, blurring the outlines and covering up all the details. We become unable to see that this thread is emotionally insecure and has a difficult time admitting that it's wrong. That's the sort of statement that some people think is complacent but which I believe is merely a statement of fact. And it's a statement that needs to be made because this thread is a pretty good liar most of the time. However, it tells so many lies, it's bound to trip itself up someday.
    This thread's tactics reek like rotten eggs. By the way, saying that last sentence out loud is a nice way to get to the point quickly at a cocktail party. I correctly predicted that this thread would irritate an incredible number of people. Alas, I didn't think it'd do that so effectively—or so soon.
    This thread should think about how its accusations lead condescending fussbudgets to erode constitutional principles that have shaped our society and remain at the core of our freedom and liberty. If this thread doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps it should just keep quiet. We should agree on definitions before saying anything further about this thread's dastardly roorbacks. For starters, let's say that "antidisestablishmentarianism" is "that which makes this thread yearn to silence the truth."
    If this thread can overawe and befuddle a sufficient number of prominent individuals then it will become virtually impossible for anyone to work together towards a shared vision. Because "lithochromatographic" is a word that can be interpreted in many ways, we must make it clear that before this thread once again claims that a plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance, it should do some real research rather than simply play a game of bias reinforcement with its factotums. I really dislike this thread. Likes or dislikes, however, are irrelevant to observed facts, such as that this thread claims that our elected officials should be available for purchase by special-interest groups. Predictably, it cites no hard data for that claim. This is because no such data exist. It's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. This thread distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain its current opinions.
    Be honest; can you in any way believe this thread's claim that zabernism is the catholicon for all the world's ills? I unmistakably cannot, mainly because I can reword my point as follows. This thread's acolytes mimic this thread's behavior to the last jot and tittle. This thread's attempts to create a desolation and call it peace are much worse than mere irreligionism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation.
    The irony is that this thread's most flippant criticisms are also its most devious. As the French say, "Les extremes se touchent." I myself definitely have a hard time reasoning with people who remain calm when they see this thread branding me as putrid. This thread is bad enough when it's alone, but it's even worse when it's joined by selfish, loathsome prats. Viewing all this from a higher vantage point, we can see that this thread's most progressive idea is to stonewall on issues in which taxpayers see a vital public interest. If that sounds progressive to you, you must be facing the wrong way.
    So this thread thinks that truth is merely a social construct? Interesting viewpoint. Here's another: It's easy enough to hate it any day of the week on general principles. But now I'll tell you about some very specific things that it is up to, things that ought to make a real this thread-hater out of you. First off, I am intellectually honest enough to admit my own previous ignorance in that matter. I wish only that it had the same intellectual honesty.
    For all of the foregoing reasons, I can confidently claim that if we are to protect the interests of the general public against the greed and unreason of incompetent gadflies, then we must be guided by a healthy and progressive ideology, not by the jackbooted and self-indulgent ideologies that this thread promotes. What I think—and I'm no specialist—is that this thread's agendas are like the Hydra from Greek mythology. They continually acquire new heads and new strength. The only way to stunt their growth is to shatter the adage that power, politics, and privilege should prevail over the rule of law. The only way to destroy this thread's Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that its spinmeisters want so much to use rock music, with its savage, tribal, orgiastic beat, to leave behind a legacy of perpetual indebtedness in developing countries that the concept of right vs. wrong never comes up. There's nothing controversial about that view. It's a fact, pure and simple. It was a fact long before anyone realized that this thread's helpers are unified under a common goal. That goal is to scorn and abjure reason.
    I don't know whether or not you've ever been physically present at a public demonstration by this thread's goombahs, but let me tell you, they're pretty treacherous. The time has come to choose between freedom or slavery, revolt or submission, and liberty or this thread's particularly sanguinolent form of neopaganism. It's clear what this thread wants us to choose, but no matter how bad you think its treatises are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think. I do not find jobations that are unctuous, loud, and wicked to be "funny". Maybe I lack a sense of humor, but maybe this thread's plan is to create problems that our grandchildren will have to live with. This thread's apple-polishers are moving at a frightening pace toward the total implementation of that agenda, which includes yielding this country to the forces of darkness, oppression, and tyranny.
    As I noted at the beginning of this letter, we must doubtlessly express our concerns about this thread's malignant hastily mounted campaigns. A compossible option is to issue a call to conscience and reason. If we follow that approach, however, we must bear in mind that this thread and its confidants are a bunch of scammers. As you know, scammers are wallies; wallies are shysters; shysters are troglodytes; and troglodytes all want to deny citizens the ability to draw their own conclusions about the potential for violence that this thread may be generating. The point is that this thread is currently limited to shrieking and spitting when it's confronted with inconvenient facts. Before long, however, this thread is likely to switch to some sort of "censor any incomplicitous taradiddles" approach to draw our attention away from such facts. The take-away message of this letter is that this thread's indifference only adds to the problem. Think about it. I don't want to have to write another letter a few years from now, in the wake of a society torn apart by this thread's childish obloquies, reminding you that you were warned.
    (
    http://www.pakin.org/complaint)
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. joehot200

    Supporter

    Aside from the complaint generator, my own personal opinion is that while Staminus/Intreppid's prices may be a bit high, there is no hidden fees/costs, you know what you are paying, and you get what you pay for with great support, ease of use, and cheaper DDoS protection.
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 2
  8. fan

    fan

    all u skids shit bricks about ddosing u should go outside and have a life during the time u are getting ddosed you are better off with $300 a month to wipe ur fucking ass it will be better for u
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  9. joehot200

    Supporter

    Unfortunatley, i am unable to find any toilet paper worth $300.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  10. LiLChris

    LiLChris Retired Moderator
    Retired

    Closed, this isn't going anywhere.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.